I mentioned in my last post that I'd write a bit about politics and religion, to try and re-center this blog on my real-life identity. I think I also mentioned that my positions aren't exactly popular. Let's go for the gusto and start with the real hot-button subject: Religion.
I'm an atheist. I'm not even an "I'm not sure if there's a god" atheist, I'm the worst kind: the kind that actively believes that there is no god. I cite as evidence a universe that has unfolded essentially exactly the way we would expect without a god. It behaves predictably, according to principles that we can uncover and understand. I will grant the possibility of a god who takes no involvement in the day-to-day workings of the universe, but it amounts to the same thing: either way the deity has no effect on my life, and I like it that way. I prefer a predictable reality with no contradictions.
Heck, I can make myself even more unpopular: I believe that faith is a BAD thing for human beings. To clarify: I define "faith" here as a belief held in the absence of, or in contradiction to, material evidence. The human brain is an amazing survival system, one that has outcompeted all the claws, jaws, and speed on the planet. Our ability to use the brain for survival is dependent on our ability to accurately perceive and analyze the world around us. To teach people to ignore or contradict physical evidence - and worse still, to teach that this ignorance is a virtue - is to undermine the very ability that allows us to survive.
But don't lynch me just yet: at least I don't go so far as to call for the banishment of all religion. I'm no Dawkins: what you believe is your own business. You can starve yourself for Zeus, and I will protect your right to do so. It's only when religion starts actively destroying or damaging the lives of human beings that I will actively oppose it.
Do you hate me yet? So much for religion. Now let's talk politics.
I'm a paleo-libertarian. That means I believe the chief responsibility of government is to protect my individual liberties and property. There may be other areas in which gevernment can be the most useful and effective solution, but there aren't many of them and they require very very careful consideration. Don't think this is a big deal? That means I'm against socialized health care, against social security, against the Federal Department of Education, and against government funding for the arts. There we go - now you get it.
I'm a Republican. Well, I would be. I can't vote in the US (yet?), but if I could I would support the small government, "meek foreign policy" objectives that defined the GOP until 2001. Notice the date: I can't stand the so-called "new conservative" movement that has dominated the party since Bush took power. I think that spreading democracy at gunpoint is a stupid and dangerous idea, that religion has no place in government, and that Guantanamo Bay and Iraq have removed whatever moral authority the US government ever had.
But I digress: those are popular ideas. Since the theme of this post is how unpopular my beliefs are, let's get back on track.
I'm a Ron Paul supporter. Yup, I'm one of those guys that swarm post-debate polls, that puts up posters around town and writes comments on every Paul-related story in the blogosphere. Go on and hate me. I think that Paul is the only candidate on either side with enough integrity to stand up to the moneyed interests that run Washington - after all, he's stood up for his principles and voted against the rest of Congress umpteen million times as a Congressman. I also think that he's the only candidate with the courage to speak to Americans like they're intelligent human beings, instead of using empty political platitudes. And I think Ron Paul is the only grassroots candidate in years that has stood a real chance of showing up the established powers in Washington.
I think that's it. To review: I'm an atheist, small-government Republican, living in the bible belt, on a college-campus, trying to break into a state-subsidized artform. I don't think that these things were so critical to my identity before I moved here, but constant exposure to commentary that I find inflammatory - and the constant social demand to shut up about it - makes this stuff uncomfortably central in one's life.
So now it's out there, I feel honest again, and I can go back to writing about music. Comments turned off, for obvious reasons.